fbpx

8910154148 | 9163228921 | info@educratias.com

Bail law and SC call for reform

    NextPrevious

    Bail law and SC call for reform

    The Supreme Court recently underlined that “there is a pressing need” for reform in the law related to bail and called on the government to consider framing a special legislation on the lines of the law in the United Kingdom.

    The law on bail

    • The CrPC does not define the word bail but only categories offences under the Indian Penal Code as ‘bailable’ and ‘non-bailable’.
    • The CrPC empowers magistrates to grant bail for bailable offences as a matter of right.
    • This would involve release on furnishing a bail bond, with or without security.
    • Non-bailable offences are cognisable, which enables the police officer to arrest without a warrant.
    • In such cases, a magistrate would determine if the accused is fit to be released on bail.

    The UK law:

    • The Bail Act of the United Kingdom, 1976, prescribes the procedure for granting bail.
    • A key feature is that one of the aims of the legislation is “reducing the size of the inmate population”.
    • The law also has provisions for ensuring legal aid for defendants.
    • The Act recognises a “general right” to be granted bail.

    The court’s ruling is in the form of guidelines, and it also draws the line on certain procedural issues for the police and judiciary.

    • Separate law for bail:
    • The court underlined that the CrPC, despite amendments since Independence, largely retains its original structure as drafted by a colonial power over its subjects.
    • It also highlighted that magistrates do not necessarily exercise their discretionary powers uniformly. The court’s solution on this is the framing of a separate law that deals with the grant of bail.
    Indiscriminate arrests:
    • It emphasised that even for cognisable offences, arrest is not mandatory and must be “necessitated”.
    Bail application:
    • “There need not be any insistence of a bail application while considering the application under Section 88, 170, 204 and 209 of the Code,” the court held.
    • These sections relate to various stages of a trial where a magistrate can decide on release of an accused.
    • The Supreme Court held that in these circumstances, magistrates must routinely consider granting bail, without insisting on a separate bail application.
    Direction to states:
    • The SC also directed all state governments and Union Territories to facilitate standing orders to comply with the orders and avoid indiscriminate arrests.
    • The CBI has already communicated earlier orders of the Court to special judges under its jurisdiction.

     

     

    READ MORE: Daily Prelims Booster

    READ MORE: Daily News Analysis

    Leave a Comment

    NextPrevious

    Admission open for IAS/IPS 2024-25 Exam.

    Fill this form to register for a free counselling