(GS3: Environment)
Japan is expected to start flushing 1.25 million tonnes of wastewater from the embattled Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean this year, as part of a $76-billion project to decommission the facility.
- Currently, the radioactive water is treated in a complex filtration process that removes most of the radioactive elements, but some remain, including tritium – deemed harmful to humans only in very large doses.
What are the concerns with this move?
- No threshold level– There is no known threshold below which radiation can be considered safe.
- Health impacts– Any discharge of radioactive materials will increase the risk of cancer and other known health impacts to those who are exposed.
- Effect on marine resource– Experts expect the affected water to poison the fish.
- South Korea banned seafood imported from around Fukushima from 2013.
- Presence of radionuclides– TEPCO hasn’t removed tritium from the water. Tritium is easily absorbed by the bodies of living creatures and rapidly distributed via blood.
- In 2018, it was reported that there were other radionuclides including isotopes of ruthenium and plutonium in the treated water that could persist for longer in the marine creatures and on the seafloor.
Alternatives:
- Longer storage – The Japanese government can store the water for longer and then discharge it as tritium’s half-life (time it takes for its quantity to be halved through radioactive decay) is 12-13 years.
- The quantity of any other radioactive isotopes present in the water will also decrease in this time so that the water could be less radioactive at the time of discharge.
- Tanks in uninhabitable land – The tanks to hold the water can be situated in the land around the Fukushima facility which was declared to be uninhabitable by the Japanese government.
- Discharge into the sea – In 2020, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) officials said the discharge would be technically feasible and would allow the timeline objective to be achieved.
